2 case study do you think kodak s charges of unfair trading practices against fuji are valid

We manufacture in over 17 countries and do research and development in three countries. This situation persisted until early s when Fuji launched an aggressive export drive, attacking Kodak in the north American and European markets. The main incentives for this are : a access to highly qualified scientists as shortages of research personnel emerge in certain fields in industrialised countries, b Cost differentials in research salaries between developing and industrialised countries, and c rationalisation of operations, assigning particular affiliates the responsibility for developing, manufacturing, and marketing particular products worldwide. Mudd would not have to take over causing all the damages. Rich however one may view it, depends solely on his intentions on doingthat action. In this case none of the characters were portraying good virtues. According to the Justice theory, it justifies the actions taken by Mr. Finally, it has one unit in Indonesia focusing on the design of audio products. In fact, I thought the personnel director went out of his way and helped Fred receive treatment. All this success, however , was apparently not enough for Kodak. Mudd who had no knowledge on how to operatethe ship. There itmade mention of his obligation to the shareholders, which was to gain much profit as possible.

This gives the debate a sense of equity concerning both firms; since they both dominate their home markets what's the reason to cry unfair? Slosh was notdrinking, his first mate Mr. We manufacture in over 17 countries and do research and development in three countries.

kodak vs fujifilm

Sam's Saunas should treatFred in the same way as it would treat any other employee who has supposedly recovered from Questions 4 1 The question is, who is responsible?

Slosh, the first mate Mr. Because of thathe may retain the status of his company, despite the oil-spill scenario. One must note that Mr. Slosh should have known that its a law not to drink and drive and he brokethat law so therefore he should be held responsible for the outcome as well.

One EU diplomat recently claimed that, "American readiness to impose unilateral sanctions makes the US prosecutor, judge, and jury on any action they deem unfair. Mudd who had no knowledge on how to operatethe ship. Due to all this, itcaused the company millions of dollars for even the most minimal clean up. Thus Kodak has put Fuji on defensive, forcing it to divert resources from overseas to defend itself at home. This was viewed to be Kodak's best chance to pry open the Japanese market. According to the Justice theory, it justifies the actions taken by Mr. It should have been the companys right and duty to fire himor replace him with another captain. Which company is truly Multinational? Slosh is also responsible in some way; he should have not allowed the captain Mr. Our product division executives have worldwide profit responsibility.

Since the WTO has already ruled on the case, Section action would be viewed as a blatant pursuit of US interests in the face of world opinion. In the end, however, one can see how fairness is played by both sides with some validity.

To punish the corporation itself, their license should be taken away suspended. Mudd should not have beendrinking because he knew what would have happened but instead he did and caused a tragedy byleaving the navigation ship to his first mate Mr. The high-profile case pitted photographic paper and film giants Kodak and Fuji against one another along with their respective governments, the US and Japan. Support your answer. Issues of fairness in trade abound in the Kodak-Fuji case. Mudd who had no knowledge on how to operatethe ship. Additionally, the newtechnology attracted a lot of competitionfrom traditional as well as new players.

Distributional arguments such as these that are supported with hard numbers represent a valuable tool in influencing opinions of fairness.

Withthe advent of digital cameras in the mids, Kodak found its sales declining asconsumers preferred the new cameras,which did not use films. Mudd would not have to take over causing all the damages.

Since many Americans lost jobs to Japanese industries that America helped rebuild, such as steel, some would argue that Japan owes the US, at the very least, access to its markets in return.

2 case study do you think kodak s charges of unfair trading practices against fuji are valid
Rated 5/10 based on 64 review
Download
International Business Answers & Business Ethics