The european welfare system

Welfare states are not static, and in the last two decades or so, many have reoriented their social protection systems towards labour market activation and social investments so as to deal with the challenges of new social risks and ageing.

Protection against labour market risks[ edit ] As can be seen, there exists a negative relationship between employment protection legislation and the share of workers receiving unemployment benefits.

problems with european welfare state

But bailing out banks, recapitalizing them and a host of other measures to save the financial sector added up to a very high bill. To identify current problems for maintaining the system of social protection.

Why do welfare states differ

In the wake of the crisis those with lower levels of education have become so-called outsiders in the European labor market Heidenreich , This ushered in a period of austerity with a view to restore balanced budgets and contain public debt. Consequently, the politics of reform increasingly came to revolve around the question of who was to pay for what, when and how. The Anglo-Saxon countries base their protection on unemployment benefits and a low level of employment protection. Yet, severe budgetary problems, the unpredictable but threatening responses of financial markets and the real economic consequences of the financial crisis not only pressure for further reform, but possibly undermine the political capacity to implement those reforms needed to guarantee the continued protection of people against social risks that the welfare state has so far offered. On the other hand, there have been increasingly drastic spending cuts that seem to undermine the social investment path that welfare states had chosen to follow. To establish a clear idea of what social spending represents in each country, the OECD published figures for total public and private social spending by its member states in ; these included 21 EU countries. The launch of a Youth Employment Initiative to support young adults in regions strongly hit by the crisis matches this aim, as well as the ratification of the European Pillar of Social Rights, which seeks to ground the benchmark principles for social rights of all Europeans.

During the last twenty 20 years or so, welfare states have been continually adjusting to new economic and social demands, and governments have pursued, albeit with considerable variation, apparently well-adapted and innovative social policies, such as social investment.

Social security, and fundamentally pensions, which vary according to the payments made by workers throughout their working lives, although also insurance schemes that cover a number of different situations orphans, widows, sickness, etc.

European welfare state definition

Those with secondary and tertiary education are more reserved to such measures, although still exhibit high approval rates. Indispensable reading! Several of the Nordic countries went through performance crises in the s, but managed to recover from this by essentially maintaining their path of development, stressing maximum labour force participation, flexible but protected labour markets and social investment. Their programmes of state aid and indicators of quality of life are below those in the previously mentioned groups. There is no such thing as the European welfare state. On the one hand, there has not been a major onslaught against the welfare state in the immediate wake of the financial crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press. So, they have a vested interest to support the notion that the EU should aid unemployed Europeans. Even though in discourse the social investment agenda still seems intact, particularly at the European level, it has also become increasingly clear that social investment policies are particularly vulnerable to cuts in the short run, precisely because social investments yield returns only in the longer run, while cost containment is a necessity now. Instead, there is no such consensus as regards the question of whether employment protection generates a higher level of unemployment. Three half-truths about the welfare state Three beliefs often pop up when people talk about the welfare state. As regards labour market, these countries are characterised by important expenditures in active labour market policies whose aim is a rapid reinsertion of the unemployed into the labour market. The financial meltdown of and the subsequent recession caused all welfare states to experience similar problems, including rising unemployment, reduced credibility of the banking sector, falling exports and rising budget deficits.

Are they about income distribution and protection or rigid procedures for the management of social risks? Robin Hood versus the Piggy Bank So, what is the whole story about the welfare state?

In contrast, with Sweden, Germany, and Poland we find countries with a relative stable economy during the crisis with the lowest approval rates.

Welfare states

Rewards for labour participation. Some economists consider that between the Continental model and the Anglo-Saxon, the latter should be preferred given its better results in employment, which make it more sustainable in the long term, whereas the equity level depends on the preferences of each country Sapir, And this uncertainty could be considered as a developmental challenge. This model is typically social service-lean and transfer-heavy. The main characteristic of labour market policies is a rigid employment protection legislation and a frequent resort to early retirement policies as a means to improve employment conditions. The employed, especially those working for the state, are well-protected insiders, whereas those without a strong attachment to the labour market are outsiders whose social protection depends on their family. In general there exists consensus among economists on the fact that employment protection generates inefficiencies inside firms. The intriguing observation to make here is that the welfare state has almost always been considered to be in crisis or to be causing one. A distinction has traditionally been made between three different types of Welfare State in Europe Social Democracy, Conservative and Liberal. Yet have they been systematised by the competent European bodies?

This perspective obviously arouses strong sentiments as some worship Robin Hood and his Merry Men as heroes of the poor, while others see him and his helpers as villains who should be detained and rendered harmless.

Rated 7/10 based on 19 review
Challenges to European Welfare Systems