The unreliability of the eyewitness essay
Eyewitness testimony problems
People think that if a person says they saw something then it must have happened. Studies show that eyewitness testimony is unreliable, and yet it is still considered the most important form of evidence. Eyewitness memory is one of the oldest forms of evidence used and has been a powerful evidence for judges. Reed1: This study examined age differences in eyewitness testimony. Include case studies to back this up. In one particular case, State v. Eyewitnesses testimonies have become a staple for many legal proceedings and is often taken as hard evidence for a crime which someone has committed. They provide crucial information that determines the fate of the criminal, whether their memories are true to the event or slightly altered. TU, with a value of P80, Statements often include descriptions given in a criminal trial and subsequent identification by individuals who were present at the crime scene.
Although, there has been many controversy debates on whether to allow the continuation of these testimonies in court, and allow it to be used as evidence.
In eyewitness testimonies, individuals take in information between the time of the crime and the testimony, which can cause memory modification. Eyewitness testimony gives details about what happened, identification of perpetrators.
So when focusing on eyewitnesses, sometimes our memory will not relay correct information due to different cues, questioning, and trauma and so forth, which makes eyewitness even harder to rely on More often than we might think, the eyewitness testimony is false, ultimately leading to false convictions, and possibly the death of an innocent person.
TU, with a value of P80, An actual experience can become distorted as best illustrated by the Cog Lab experiment on false memories accessed through Argosy University.
Upon seeing all this he runs immediately to the police to report what he has found.
based on 7 review